| System | Annex III Classification | Provider Obligations | Conformity Route |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candidate Match Scoring | Point 4(a) — Recruitment / screening / ranking of candidates | Chapter III §2 | Internal Check (Art. 43) |
| Voice / Video Agent | Point 4(a) — AI-assisted job interviews / candidate evaluation | Chapter III §2 | Internal Check (Art. 43) |
Risk Management System
Continuous iterative risk management process established. Risks of bias and discrimination identified pre-deployment. Residual risks evaluated and deemed acceptable with mitigation measures.
ImplementedData & Data Governance
Training and testing datasets documented. Demographic representation assessed. Data provenance and bias examination practices in place. No sensitive attributes used as direct model inputs.
ImplementedTechnical Documentation
System purpose, architecture, capabilities, limitations, and performance metrics documented. Documentation maintained and updated with each model version. Available to competent authorities on request.
ImplementedRecord-Keeping & Logging
Automatic logging of system operation. Audit trail with timestamps retained for minimum 3 years post-EU deployment. Logs traceable to individual scoring events.
ImplementedTransparency & Information
Deployers informed of system capabilities and limitations. Candidate-facing disclosure provided. Instructions for use including bias risks and human oversight requirements supplied.
ImplementedHuman Oversight
Human override mechanism implemented. Deployers cannot act solely on AI output for final hiring decisions. System designed to facilitate, not replace, human judgment. Override documented per session.
ImplementedAccuracy, Robustness & Cybersecurity
Performance metrics validated. Model robustness against adversarial inputs tested. Outputs calibrated across demographic groups. Security review completed pre-EU deployment.
ImplementedProhibited Practices Check
No subliminal manipulation, exploitation of vulnerabilities, social scoring, real-time biometric identification, or emotion recognition in professional contexts. All prohibited practices absent.
No prohibited practicesPost-Market Monitoring
Monthly bias auditing constitutes ongoing post-market monitoring. Serious incident reporting procedure established. EU database registration planned prior to EU market placement.
Registration complete| Group | # Applicants | # Selected | Selection Rate | Impact Ratio | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female (Reference) | 2,890 | 1,412 | 48.86% | 1.00 | Reference |
| Male | 2,870 | 1,363 | 47.49% | 0.97 | Conformant |
| Group | # Applicants | # Selected | Selection Rate | Impact Ratio | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic / Latino (Reference) | 1,455 | 735 | 50.52% | 1.00 | Reference |
| Asian | 1,395 | 688 | 49.32% | 0.98 | Conformant |
| White | 1,460 | 685 | 46.92% | 0.93 | Conformant |
| Black or African American | 1,450 | 667 | 46.00% | 0.91 | Conformant |
| Group | # Applicants | # Selected | Selection Rate | Impact Ratio | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 40 (Reference) | 2,880 | 1,440 | 50.00% | 1.00 | Reference |
| 40 and over | 2,880 | 1,225 | 42.50% | 0.99 | Pass |
| Group | # Applicants | # Selected | Selection Rate | Impact Ratio | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (Reference) | 2,870 | 1,406 | 48.99% | 1.00 | Reference |
| Female | 2,890 | 1,419 | 49.10% | 1.00 | Conformant |
| Group | # Applicants | # Selected | Selection Rate | Impact Ratio | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 40 (Reference) | 2,880 | 1,469 | 51.00% | 1.00 | Reference |
| 40 and over | 2,880 | 1,411 | 49.00% | 0.96 | Conformant |
- Right to non-discrimination (Art. 21 EU Charter) — Bias audit demonstrates no significant adverse impact on race, sex, or ethnicity groups. Age dimension passes.
- Right to dignity (Art. 1) — No use of emotion recognition, facial analysis, or psychometric profiling. Candidates assessed on job-relevant competencies only.
- Data protection (Art. 8, GDPR) — Candidate data processed lawfully. Retention limits enforced. No unnecessary personal data used as model input. DPIA completed.
- Right to an explanation (GDPR Art. 22) — Candidates may request human review of AI-influenced shortlisting decisions. Opt-out pathway available.
- Right to equality (Age — Directive 2000/78) — All age dimensions pass conformity threshold. Voice Agent at 0.96, Match Scoring at 0.99.
- No prohibited AI practices (Art. 5) — No subliminal manipulation, social scoring, real-time biometric ID, or exploitation of vulnerabilities.